David - you may find my previous message on how to setup filters in
Thunderbird to use the List-Id: header helpful - here are links to three
popular mail archives for the message:
Official Apache mail archive:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-ooo-users/201201.mbox/%3C4F06F72E.6030105%40shanecurcuru.org%3E
Unofficial but highly useful searchable MarkMail archive:
http://markmail.org/message/katmtejfsx5xomvo
Unofficial GMANE archive:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.incubator.ooo.user/430/match=forum+name+subject
- Shane
On 2012-01-07 8:00 AM, David B Teague sr wrote:
On 1/7/2012 4:21 AM, Mike Scott wrote:
On 06/01/12 18:07, Stuart wrote:
On 1/4/2012 8:07 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
If there is consensus for introducing a [users] or [ooo-users] subject
prefix on this list too, it can probably be done. But if there are
people who prefer not to have a subject prefix then we are stuck. As
for me, I don't have strong preferences, but I find it reasonable that
users list rely on the simple subject prefix while developers lists
expect more sophisticated headers handling.
the previous OOO-users mailing list had a prefix of [users]. I don't
understand why there is so much drama about reverting back to the same
functionality this mailing list had in its previous incarnation?
It's akin to discussing which end of the egg you open. It really
doesn't actually matter that much, and there are arguments both ways
(although I happen to favour the "don't do it" side, as it's clearly
better :-) :-) ).
I have found it convenient to make Thunderbird email rules to use
[users] etc prefixes. On the other hand, the address from whence the
messages come appears to be consistent ([email protected])
so a single rule for OOO-users is possible. If this is continues, I do
not care about a prefix.
David
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
