On Sun, 10 Mar 2002, Edward Millington wrote: > READ_ANSW_TIMEOUT > > change to 5mins > > Install gigabase dB. working better that berk. dB. > > oops seems to working pretty good and keeping tracks with threads.
BTW, I forgot to note: there is library which someone on the IBM wrote which make M:N thread scheduling (this library based on the gnu pth). It will give you less kernel threads and many user-level threads, anf thus can reduce problerms with lot of threads under linux. I never tested it. > > normal removing cache cause a hit ratio of 3-9% for about a week. > > >From start, hit ratio when from 9% to 25% with a couple of hours. chech > average hit below. > > Could this be because of my new config(part of)? Sorry, I can't understand your question. Total hit rate of 33% is normal thing. > > } > > By giving "db_cache_mem" more cause this? That was the only thing I change > after setting up oops again! "db_cache_mem" can chenge performance, not hit ratio. Igor Khasilev | PACO Links, igor at paco dot net | ===================================================================== If you would like to unsubscribe from this list send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe oops-eng" in message body. Archive is accessible on http://lists.paco.net/oops-eng/
