> Sorry, I can't understand your question. Total hit rate of 33% is normal > thing.
not after deleting your cache. I change to gigabase dB. as I stated before, to reach that % takes a week, but not even continuous like what I am, seeing. ok. >>db_cache_mem" can chenge performance, not hit ratio When you state performance, do you mean response time and req/sec? > BTW, I forgot to note: there is library which someone on the IBM wrote which > make M:N thread scheduling (this library based on the gnu pth). It will give > you less kernel threads and many user-level threads, anf thus can reduce > problerms with lot of threads under linux. I never tested it. Can you shed a little bit more light above. Are you saying that oops can use alot more thread under the user thread instead of the os kernel thread? Nice that you still remember that I have an IBM So this seems to be a problem IBM create on there machines? Thank you very much. Best regards, Edward Millington. BSc, Network+ Systems Administrator Cariaccess Communications Ltd. Palm Plaza Wildey St. Michael Barbados 1-246-430-7435 Fax : 1-246-431-0170 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.cariaccess.com ===================================================================== If you would like to unsubscribe from this list send message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe oops-eng" in message body. Archive is accessible on http://lists.paco.net/oops-eng/
