On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cool! I'm going to hazard a guess as to why. The clipboard access is > done using registered native functions.
That is cool. And, indirectly, why I thought this was a timing problem. It looked to me like the two back to back external function calls in the test case were just happening too fast. The underlying clipboard object for the paste was truly signaling that it did not have data. By that I mean there was not a bug in the code of the interpretation of status flags. Since we had this brand spanking new API, I attributed the 'too fast' to that. <grin> -- Mark Miesfeld ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
