Mark Miesfeld wrote: > I would not be surprised if 4.1.3 has a dependency on a system API not > available on Windows 2000. But, I would expect a different type of message.
Based on the compiler used, or do you think within the source code itself has been written in some dependency on a minimum of Windows XP? Mark Miesfeld wrote: > What exactly happens, and what is the exact message you are getting? Simply this: > On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Michael Lueck <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > Trying to start it at the command line returns that the program is **not > a valid Wind32 application**. Then it dumps me back to the next command prompt. I am thinking to sequentially walk the version tree back from 4.1.3 and test each ooRexx v4.x version to see if I can at least get higher than 3.2. Recently I learned that Mod_Rexx would work with ooRexx 4.x branch versions. I was under the impression that it would not and I would have to wait for Mod_ooRexx's release. So, eager to get beyond ooRexx 3.2 on this server. Blessings, -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
