I agree, but as said before, I think it was Rick, we need an automated Mac 
installer that is integrated into the CMake build lists.

One way to accomplish that is to move forward the no-admin version, we could 
then just automate building a .dmg with the materials on it, to move to a 
suitable location - ~/Applications comes to mind. When there is knowledge of 
scriptable installer builders, we need to use that. Since I made the first Mac 
installers with the awkward dialogs and scripts a lot has changed. I will 
communicate with P.O. and Enrico and see what can be done.

I still need to move the Jenkins to a place where it keeps working and then we 
can release from there and upload to SF. I will try to put together a checklist 
on the wiki on SF (it has one doesn’t it). When we have worked on that, we’ll 
need to confer with Erich and Rick, and branch.


best regards,

René.


> On 15 Nov 2018, at 10:17, Rony G. Flatscher <rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at> wrote:
> 
> This past year there have been many remarkable changes (performance 
> improvements from 1.2x to 20x
> times, memory management, multi threading) and additions (ADDRESS...WITH, 
> variable references) to
> ooRexx 5.0 beta, which already was great with respect to valuabel and new 
> features a year ago!
> 
> Judging from my work on BSF4ooRexx and ooRexx projects, ooRexx 5.0beta has 
> become stabler, faster
> and more versatile than the almost five years old ooRexx 4.2.0 (release date: 
> February 2014).
> 
> Therefore, I think, it is time to create a release version of ooRexx 5.0beta, 
> such that companies
> and organisations become able to install and take advantage of it! (As long 
> as software is dubbed
> "beta" it usually does not get deployed for professional purposes in 
> organisations.)
> 
> So I suggest to create a branch 5.0.0 which does not take any new features 
> anymore, just bug-fixes
> and materials to complete it (e.g. test units, documentation) "as fast as 
> possible". (Any new
> features would go to trunk only and could be used to create a 5.1 version 
> shortly after the release
> of 5.0.)
> 
> ---rony
> 
> P.S.: After the release of 5.0 I would really suggest to create a version 5.1 
> as soon as possible
> thereafter, which allows ooRexx to be run without administrative privileges 
> on Windows, Linux and
> MacOSX!
> 
> P.P.S.: There are many important additional features for ooRexx post 5.x like 
> Unicode-support, now
> that even English versions of Windows create Unicode text files by default, 
> let alone international
> users of ooRexx with a need for support for their culture's glyphs (also 
> speeding up/simplifying
> interfacing with Unicode-systems like Java, applications employing Unicode 
> for which ooRexx should
> serve as a scripting language, but also operating systems like Linux, MacOSX 
> and Windows). Or
> getting a NetRexx like catch-finally construct, or ... much, much more! :)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel



_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to