Hi P.O., great! no problems here, if you put the script somewhere I can test it, I will add it to the build machine. I will try to test the T20 as soon as I can. Having some connectivity problems today but maybe tomorrow.
best regards, René. > On 15 Nov 2018, at 18:02, P.O. Jonsson <oor...@jonases.se> wrote: > > Dear René, > > In principle I have (almost) all the steps ready to do a .dmg installer, with > some limitations. I did not manage to get it all controlled from CMake but > would an afterburner shell script be so bad? > > CMake <complex command> > make > make install > bash afterburner.sh > > There are ways around sudo password > > https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4469969 > <https://discussions.apple.com/thread/4469969> > > And I would expect that on a machine with a strong password for remote login > (my ooRexx Mac mini) used by a single user (Jenkins) for the sole purpose of > building ooRexx such use would be acceptable, security wise, or do you > disagree? > > Using this method it is possible to create the entire chain of commands set > out above without any user interaction. I have tried it out on my own machine > and it does work (but is a bad idea for permanent use on a „normal“ user > account, I know). > > Personally I have nothing against two or more „official" ooRexx installers, > one for /opt, one for ~/Applications and the BSF4ooRexx installer (but that > might suffice to link to). For the two first I think I can do a dmg installer > but bear with me for a week or so, I am quite busy with non-oo stuff and I > also want to finalize the test cases for the sample files (and test them). > > Regarding Jenkins Master I have offered the T20 Windows machine as a host > (test is up&running at http://jonases24.asuscomm.com:50000/login?from=%2F > <http://jonases24.asuscomm.com:50000/login?from=/>) but on second thoughts I > think it might be bad idea to have the Jenkins Master on a physical machine > needing maintenance and support. I have virtually no knowledge on how to > manage the environment where Jenkins is currently running and I think a > rented server/cloud solution would be a safer and more stable situation. The > T20 could then be used to host the slave for Windows 10 32/64 or whatever is > needed. But if you find time to do a test please give it a try, the machine > is not used for anything else. > > Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse, > P.O. Jonsson > oor...@jonases.se <mailto:oor...@jonases.se> > > > >> Am 15.11.2018 um 17:17 schrieb René Jansen <rvjan...@xs4all.nl >> <mailto:rvjan...@xs4all.nl>>: >> >> I agree, but as said before, I think it was Rick, we need an automated Mac >> installer that is integrated into the CMake build lists. >> >> One way to accomplish that is to move forward the no-admin version, we could >> then just automate building a .dmg with the materials on it, to move to a >> suitable location - ~/Applications comes to mind. When there is knowledge of >> scriptable installer builders, we need to use that. Since I made the first >> Mac installers with the awkward dialogs and scripts a lot has changed. I >> will communicate with P.O. and Enrico and see what can be done. >> >> I still need to move the Jenkins to a place where it keeps working and then >> we can release from there and upload to SF. I will try to put together a >> checklist on the wiki on SF (it has one doesn’t it). When we have worked on >> that, we’ll need to confer with Erich and Rick, and branch. >> >> >> best regards, >> >> René. >> >> >>> On 15 Nov 2018, at 10:17, Rony G. Flatscher <rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at >>> <mailto:rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at>> wrote: >>> >>> This past year there have been many remarkable changes (performance >>> improvements from 1.2x to 20x >>> times, memory management, multi threading) and additions (ADDRESS...WITH, >>> variable references) to >>> ooRexx 5.0 beta, which already was great with respect to valuabel and new >>> features a year ago! >>> >>> Judging from my work on BSF4ooRexx and ooRexx projects, ooRexx 5.0beta has >>> become stabler, faster >>> and more versatile than the almost five years old ooRexx 4.2.0 (release >>> date: February 2014). >>> >>> Therefore, I think, it is time to create a release version of ooRexx >>> 5.0beta, such that companies >>> and organisations become able to install and take advantage of it! (As long >>> as software is dubbed >>> "beta" it usually does not get deployed for professional purposes in >>> organisations.) >>> >>> So I suggest to create a branch 5.0.0 which does not take any new features >>> anymore, just bug-fixes >>> and materials to complete it (e.g. test units, documentation) "as fast as >>> possible". (Any new >>> features would go to trunk only and could be used to create a 5.1 version >>> shortly after the release >>> of 5.0.) >>> >>> ---rony >>> >>> P.S.: After the release of 5.0 I would really suggest to create a version >>> 5.1 as soon as possible >>> thereafter, which allows ooRexx to be run without administrative privileges >>> on Windows, Linux and >>> MacOSX! >>> >>> P.P.S.: There are many important additional features for ooRexx post 5.x >>> like Unicode-support, now >>> that even English versions of Windows create Unicode text files by default, >>> let alone international >>> users of ooRexx with a need for support for their culture's glyphs (also >>> speeding up/simplifying >>> interfacing with Unicode-systems like Java, applications employing Unicode >>> for which ooRexx should >>> serve as a scripting language, but also operating systems like Linux, >>> MacOSX and Windows). Or >>> getting a NetRexx like catch-finally construct, or ... much, much more! :) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Oorexx-devel mailing list >>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >>> <mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Oorexx-devel mailing list >> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> <mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
