The test are coming out pretty well Buillt from a SVN repo Open Object Rexx Version 5.0.0 r11911 Svn[11911+] Build date: Sep 13 2019 Addressing mode: 64 Copyright (c) 1995, 2004 IBM Corporation. All rights reserved. Copyright (c) 2005-2019 Rexx Language Association. All rights reserved.
The “+” tells that there are uncommitted changes Built from a GIT Repo [enrico@enrico-imac ooRexx.trunk.bin]$/Users/enrico/ooRexx/bin/rexx -v Open Object Rexx Version 5.0.0 r1 Git[9e6661ee02d3] Build date: Sep 13 2019 Addressing mode: 64 Copyright (c) 1995, 2004 IBM Corporation. All rights reserved. Copyright (c) 2005-2019 Rexx Language Association. All rights reserved. Enrico PS.: If You want I can also do it for a mercurial repository I know the nobody wants to hear about it, but having a GIT repo would make collaboration MUCH MORE EASY Fork the repo Commit the proposed changes to the forked repository Create a pull request Process the pull request ( apply / reject ) > On 13 Sep 2019, at 11:44, Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, I object to the removal. Including the revision number information is a > helpful tool for problem determination. I much prefer Enrico's suggestion to > enhance this to obtain the revision number from other sources as well. > > Rick > > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 12:18 AM René Jansen <rvjan...@xs4all.nl > <mailto:rvjan...@xs4all.nl>> wrote: > I am maintaining a docker image based on Arch linux that contains LSPF and > ooRexx 5.0.0. I just tried to rebuild that because of the impending symposium > and had spurious behavior from svn on SourceForge (truncated http response > bodies blablabla) and I could not fix that quickly. > > So I decided to put up a copy on Github which works brilliantly. But … and > here it comes… CmakeLists.txt has a hard dependency on Subversion and does an > 'svn info' which breaks the build from git, as that is not an svn working > copy. > > I cannot see the rationale for this. Took it out and the build succeeds. Does > anybody mind if I take that out of the svn repository CMakeLists.txt also? > > best regards, > > René. > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel> > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
