OK, thanks for the info, I have updated the test case accordingly. Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse, P.O. Jonsson oor...@jonases.se
> Am 01.10.2019 um 13:21 schrieb Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com>: > > This was a change for bug 1633. The original implementation seriously missed > the mark on both how the timezone should be interpreted when parsing the ISO > format and also the syntax of the format itself. > > Rick > > On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 6:28 AM P.O. Jonsson <oor...@jonases.se > <mailto:oor...@jonases.se>> wrote: > Dear developers, > > I had a failure in the test of the timezone.rexx sample: > > [failure] [20191001 11:38:33.555429] > svn: runknown Change date: unknown > Test: TEST_04_TIMEZONE.REX > Class: timezone.testGroup > File: .../ooRexx/samples/timezone.testGroup > Line: 155 > Failed: assertEquals > Expected: [[Original date: 2009-03-08T00:30:00.000000-0500], > identityHash="-4560494593"] > Actual: [[Original date: 2009-03-07T19:30:00.000000-05:00], > identityHash="-4551321553"] > > There are two differences compared to the past (I only ran the samples tests > some months ago): > > 0500 changed to 05:00 > 08T00:30 changed to 07T19:30 > > The line in timezone.rex where it fails is: > > say 'Original date:' finalTime~utcIsoDate > > finalTime is an instance of the DateTime class > > When I looked at the latest rexxreff.pdf it states for the method utcIsoDate: > > Returns the timestamp formatted as a string in ISO timezone-qualified date > format. If the timezone offiset is 0, the format is > yyyy-mm-ddThh:mm:ss.uuuuuuZ. If the offset is positive, the string is > formatted as yyyy-mm-ddThh:mm:ss.uuuuuu+hhmm. If the offset is negative, the > result will be in the format yyyy-mm-ddThh:mm:ss.uuuuuu-hhmm. > > The current output is thus not consistent with the documentation. > > Shall I report this as a bug or can you take it from here? The first change > is merely formal but the 2nd one I am not sure how to interpret. > > The testcases for all the samples were offered in March this year and can be > found here: > > https://www.dropbox.com/sh/p66c7g01h4jz5ss/AAAZd_Q2yQddrTHagxPo_UiTa?dl=0 > <https://www.dropbox.com/sh/p66c7g01h4jz5ss/AAAZd_Q2yQddrTHagxPo_UiTa?dl=0> > > PS good news is that all other samples test cases worked fine :-) > > Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse, > P.O. Jonsson > oor...@jonases.se <mailto:oor...@jonases.se> > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net <mailto:Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > <https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel> > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
