SVG is a vector format, and png is a raster format. Print media always has (well, needs to have) a higher resolution than screen media. Vector graphics can be sized without any loss of sharpness, so are preferred by typographers. Also, this screens with higer resolutions than our current screens. I am tempted to say that if svg does not render well, it’s the browser’s problem, and any graphics in the production of documentation need to be vector graphics.
René. > On 6 Mar 2020, at 21:21, Erich Steinböck <erich.steinbo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Rony, the SVG images work fine when building for PDF, but last time I tried > building for HTML, I found that they displayed much worse than PNG. > This was with the old Publican build, not Gil's new tool chain, so I'm not > sure how our current results are with building for HTML, but you might want > to wait until we understand which format works well for HTML, before doing > all the work turning PNGs into SVGs. > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
