Having spent some time looking at the documentation while developing the
system to build the books, I found that we actually have a set of
conventions on how things are displayed. This is part of every document,
under the title "Typographic Conventions", right near the beginning of
the book. So this proposal seems rather extreme to me as it could have a
major impact on all our documents. Just my opinion. Gil
On 3/19/2020 6:55 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
While working on the documentation I learned the following elements
being typeset in monotype font, however all are using the boldest
version of the font which in the case of rexxpg makes some elements
stand out far too strong.
So the question would be whether it was possible to format the
monotype elements like "code" to not be as bold (maybe semi-bold) or
alternatively, not being bold at all but italicized instead?
These elements are typeset the same way (monotype and in the boldest
possible font, it seems):
* code
* computeroutput
* filename
* literal
Just look up the rexxpg book where the boldness communicates an
importness above all other text and is distracting (like in the table
of context).
What do you think?
---rony
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
--
Gil Barmwater
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
