Hi Rony,

I finally have had an opportunity to look into this issue. I downloaded your version of rexxpg and opened it next to the one that comes with the ooRexx build which is "pre-split" so it has none of the changes that you have made. One thing I noticed was that you have added tags "inside" the examples which I had not seen before. My understanding of the <programlisting> tag was that it was supposed to show code examples or snippets "as-is" with the possible exception of syntax highlighting, a separate issue. Now, as you have demonstrated, you CAN "tag" parts of a <code> or <programlisting> section but I don't see the benefit of doing so. Similarly, tagging words in the section titles causes the TOC (which is automatically generated) to display them accordingly. So, if it were me doing the work, I would only use the tags in the paragraphs where they draw the distinction between the prose and the "names" of important things. Again, just my opinion. Our documents have always only used the three types of typographic conventions described in the the Preface of each book. Deviating from that "standard" needs a whole lot more discussion and consideration IMHO.

Gil

On 3/20/2020 9:15 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
On 19.03.2020 14:31, Gil Barmwater wrote:
Having spent some time looking at the documentation while developing the system 
to build the
books, I found that we actually have a set of conventions on how things are 
displayed. This is
part of every document, under the title "Typographic Conventions", right near 
the beginning of the
book. So this proposal seems rather extreme to me as it could have a major 
impact on all our
documents. Just my opinion.

Gil, of course there is no intention to have any negative impact on the 
documentation!

The current boldness is quite strong and looking at the rexxpg book (also in 
the TOC!) the bolded,
monotype text stands out prominently. Hence wondering whether removing the 
boldness (but leaving it)
to semi-bold would be possible at all. And if it was possible it still needs to 
be assessed whether
it negatively impacts the overall look-and feel of the books.

---rony




_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

--
Gil Barmwater



_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to