Thank you. I too would not want this to hold up progress towards v5.0 On Sat, 18 Jun 2022 at 13:05, Michael Lueck <mlu...@lueckdatasystems.com> wrote:
> Greetings Harmander, > > Personally since Classic Rexx on say OS/2 is so antiquated these days, I > think the line has long been crossed for quickly executing untouched > Classic Rexx programs on current ooRexx. > > At least that is my vote... when porting Classic Rexx to ooRexx, expect > some code changes to best optimize for ooRexx. > > I am thankful, > > -- > Michael Lueck > Lueck Data Systems > http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ > > > Harmander Singh wrote: > > Terry, > > One issue which came up in this context a long while back was that at > some stage in the development of v5.0, the classic Rexx file input > statements linein, charin 'had a performance hit' (they became > > much slower than their ooRexx counterparts). > > > > That problem doesn't appear to have been as yet addressed (I had checked > a few months ago). > > > > I can't say if this issue is a 'showstopper'. > > > > Harmander Singh > > > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
