I have lightly tested the s390x portable build under docker versions of s390x/ubuntu and s390x/almalinux - both work. I think that we even can remove the ‘ubuntu’ segment of the name of the zip that contains the portable version.
Next step should probably be to get the ooRexx builds in the platform versions of the linux distributions - all people I know will only be willing to ’sudo apt install oorexx’ or ‘yum install oorexx’. We had this SUSE person building for oorexx years, maybe he can help here. We can start with private repositories and publish the way people have to add those to their apt or yum or pacman, but getting through to the official ones would be a coup. Maybe @Mark knows - Regina is in all of them? best regards, René. > On 24 Jan 2023, at 16:43, ooRexx <oor...@jonases.se> wrote: > >> >> On 24. Jan 2023, at 12:44, Rony G. Flatscher <rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at >> <mailto:rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at>> wrote: >> >> P.O., >> >> this is *really* great, super! >> >> Just a question: would it be possible for you to also create the portable >> versions for 5.0.0 for s390x (and all other platforms)? >> >> > > Rony - I anticipated your question and built the portable s390x for 5.0.0 > already ;-) > > If no-one objects I can add a “portable” folder under 5.0.0 and make > retrospective builds for the other platforms. Only snag is that I need to add > oobuild.pdf to the documentation, we removed that requirement after build > 12583 so it needs to be the there or the build fails. Will take some days > though.
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
