Hi René,

> Am 26.01.2023 um 11:48 schrieb René Jansen <rvjan...@xs4all.nl>:
> 
> I have lightly tested the s390x portable build under docker versions of 
> s390x/ubuntu and s390x/almalinux - both work. I think that we even can remove 
> the ‘ubuntu’ segment of the name of the zip that contains the portable 
> version.
> 
If you think that is fine for S390 please go ahead and change the one on 
Sourceforge but the naming follows from rules (same rules for all) in 
CMakelists.txt so I do not want to tamper with that. For the Zip I pass the 
ball to Rony, he wrote those rules.

> Next step should probably be to get the ooRexx builds in the platform 
> versions of the linux distributions - all people I know will only be willing 
> to ’sudo apt install oorexx’ or ‘yum install oorexx’. We had this SUSE person 
> building for oorexx years, maybe he can help here. We can start with private 
> repositories and publish the way people have to add those to their apt or yum 
> or pacman, but getting through to the official ones would be a coup.
> 
All our ooRexx installers are installable locally using apt, dpkg, synoptic, 
dnf, zypper, yast, pkg, pkgin, pkg_in or whatever the particular Linux/Unix 
think is the „best“ installer, but I assume you mean from an official 
repository? I cannot help here but the official builds should all work on their 
respective platforms (and probably on many siblings).

> Maybe @Mark knows - Regina is in all of them?
> 
> best regards,
> 
> René.
> 
> 
>> On 24 Jan 2023, at 16:43, ooRexx <oor...@jonases.se> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On 24. Jan 2023, at 12:44, Rony G. Flatscher <rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at 
>>> <mailto:rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> P.O., 
>>> 
>>> this is *really* great, super!
>>> 
>>> Just a question: would it be possible for you to also create the portable 
>>> versions for 5.0.0 for s390x (and all other platforms)?
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> Rony - I anticipated your question and built the portable s390x for 5.0.0 
>> already ;-)
>> 
>> If no-one objects I can add a “portable” folder under 5.0.0 and make 
>> retrospective builds for the other platforms. Only snag is that I need to 
>> add oobuild.pdf to the documentation, we removed that requirement after 
>> build 12583 so it needs to be the there or the build fails. Will take some 
>> days though.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to