Hi P.O., On 10.05.2023 09:50, ooRexx wrote:
I added the missing softlink so that Windows users can find rxsock.pdf,
+1
Is this the right way to do it on sourceforge?
Probably! :)
The status “Closed” is only set when there is a release version, right? When shall the status “Pending” be used?
AFAIU if a bug got fixed, an enhancement added etc. then the tracker item should be set to "Pending" to make it possible to quickly find such tracked items when a new release gets created. After a new release all "Pending" tracker items will be set to "Closed".
What is the difference between the milestones 5.0.0, 5.0.1 and 5.1.0?
This is something I really do not know. Also the naming of these three parts of a version string is unintuitive if looking at .rexxinfo. There are two problems, one being the naming of version related entries being "majorVersion", "release" (no "version" in name) and "modification" (no "version" in name), the other being using the version string "5.0.0" instead of something like "3.1.2" where each part has a different value. .RexxInfo in rexxref.pdf gives as examples, using "5.0.0":
* .rexxinfo~majorVersion: returns "5" * .rexxinfo~release: returns "0" (second or third position?) * .rexxinfo~modification: returns "0" (second or third position?)
This fix solved the problem for 5.1.0Beta but the installer for 5.0.0 is still missing it. Is it ok to go in and make a retrospective build for 5.0.0 and correct it manually?
Yes, I guess so. HTH ---rony
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
