On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 3:51 AM ooRexx <oor...@jonases.se> wrote: > I added the missing softlink so that Windows users can find rxsock.pdf, Is > this the right way to do it on sourceforge? > > The status “Closed” is only set when there is a release version, right? > > When shall the status “Pending” be used? >
Pending should be used until the change is available in a shipped release. That allows us to determine what changes are actually in a release. Closed should never be used until a release containing the change has shipped. > > What is the difference between the milestones 5.0.0, 5.0.1 and 5.1.0? > That indicates which release the change is going to ship on. Since the 5.0.0 has already been released, that should never be used again. 5.0.1 would be a release that will contain only bug fixes to 5.0.0. The 5.1.0 release will contain new content, as well as bug fixes to 5.0.0 content. Bug fixes like this one should be applied to both the trunk and the 5.0.1 branch and the 5.0.1 milestone used. > > This fix solved the problem for 5.1.0Beta but the installer for 5.0.0 is > still missing it. Is it ok to go in and make a retrospective build for > 5.0.0 and correct it manually? > No, it is not ok. Once 5.0.0 has shipped, no changes to that tree are permitted. Fixes can only be released by spinning a 5.0.1 release. > > Any information on how the bug tracker should be used is welcome. > > Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse, > P.O. Jonsson > oor...@jonases.se > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > *From: *"Per Olov Jonsson" <perolovjons...@users.sourceforge.net> > *Subject: **[oorexx:bugs] #1897 Entry missing in Windows installer* > *Date: *10. May 2023 at 09:02:55 CEST > *To: *"[oorexx:bugs] " <1...@bugs.oorexx.p.re.sourceforge.net> > *Reply-To: *"[oorexx:bugs] " <1...@bugs.oorexx.p.re.sourceforge.net> > > - **status**: open --> accepted > - **assigned_to**: Per Olov Jonsson > - **Comment**: > > Fixed with r12676 > > > > --- > > **[bugs:#1897] Entry missing in Windows installer** > > **Status:** accepted > **Group:** None > **Created:** Sun May 07, 2023 08:15 PM UTC by Per Olov Jonsson > **Last Updated:** Sun May 07, 2023 08:15 PM UTC > **Owner:** Per Olov Jonsson > > > For Windows there is no entry referring to rxSock.cls documentation in > the Documentation folder in the ooRexx startup menu item. RxSock.pdf exists > but the Windows user may not be aware of its existence since it is not in > the list of links in the Start Menu item for ooRexx. > > What is missing is a softlink with an appropriate name > > from > > C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs\Open Object > Rexx\Documentation > > to > > C:\Program Files\ooRexx\doc\rxsock.pdf > > > --- > > Sent from sourceforge.net because you indicated interest in < > https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/1897/> > > > > To unsubscribe from further messages, please visit < > https://sourceforge.net/auth/subscriptions/> > > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
