Missatge de Jean Louis Faucher <[email protected]> del dia ds., 27 de juny 2026 a les 18:56:
> Very nice! > Thank you! :) > > +1 to deliver ooRexx doc with highlighted code. > > Out of curiousity, does it highlight the C/C++ code in rexxapi? > Nope, I'm only taking care of Rexx code. > > On 27 Jun 2026, at 16:29, Josep Maria Blasco <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hi, > > Based on the excellent tools created by Gil, I have created new versions > which take advantage of the Rexx Highlighter to produce nicely highlighted > versions of the ooRexx documentation. For example, > > https://github.com/RexxLA/maintenancedocs/blob/main/oorexx/rexxref.pdf > > is a fully highlighted version of the ooRexx reference. > > > > Some raw feedback: > > Can't be previewed from github > Error rendering embedded code > Doesn't happen here. [image: imagen.png] > > 1.10.3. Comments > "Example 1.3." the first code block is highlighted, the second code block > is not. > Yes. There's no sensible way to highlight the second code block, as it is syntactically incorrect. > > 5.1.1.14. isMetaclass > Example 5.9. not fitting the width > there is a change of line in official doc > Yes, the official doc breaks the line, but this is not a good idea. Thanks for spotting it. Fixed. > > 5.1.2.19. triggered > the output of "Example 5.24." is gray, like in official doc > so it's managed differently from Example 5.23.? > there may be some small incoherences like these ones. Thanks again for spotting them. All fixed. The nice thing about our current setup is that 1) the standard PDF are untouched, and 2) it's easy to spot these small errors and correct them. Josep Maria > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
