> On 27 Jun 2026, at 19:47, Josep Maria Blasco <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> >> 1.10.3. Comments >> "Example 1.3." the first code block is highlighted, the second code block is >> not. > > Yes. There's no sensible way to highlight the second code block, as it is > syntactically incorrect.
ah, yes... I forgot this precondition :-) >> >> 5.1.1.14. isMetaclass >> Example 5.9. not fitting the width >> there is a change of line in official doc > > Yes, the official doc breaks the line, but this is not a good idea. Thanks > for spotting it. Fixed. >> >> 5.1.2.19. triggered >> the output of "Example 5.24." is gray, like in official doc >> so it's managed differently from Example 5.23.? > > there may be some small incoherences like these ones. > Thanks again for spotting them. > > All fixed. Thank you > > The nice thing about our current setup is that 1) the standard > PDF are untouched, and 2) it's easy to spot these small > errors and correct them. I should check by myself, but it's easier to ask... Do you need to modify the DocBook files to have syntax-highlighted code blocks?
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
