On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge <
jn.ml.sfrg...@letterboxes.org> wrote:
> Mark Miesfeld <miesf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > One of the advertised benefits of SQLite is its small binary file size.
> > To me the difference between an oosqlite.dll of 1,913,344 bytes and one
> of
> > 790,016 bytes is insignificant. But, I know of some people in the Rexx
> > community that would aghast at that statement, how could I conceivably
> > think a 220% size increase was insignificant.
>
> Perhaps more to the point is whether a DLL of nearly 2MB presents a problem
> to anyone - who's going to be running SQLite - these days? Presumably
> people using non-trivially sized databases would normally be running
> machines with several GB RAM. How then would such a small difference in
> DLL
> size matter?
>
That is the point. I don't think the 2MB DLL is a problem, and it cuts
down maintenance work.
--
Mark Miesfeld
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-users mailing list
Oorexx-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-users
