Chris, thanks for the detailed info, Regarding the binaries you found, are for testing MR pipes.
Should we remove them from the release ? Thanks. Alejandro On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Chris Douglas <[email protected]> wrote: > Great news! > > Once the community is satisfied with the state of the artifact, we'll > need to go over any packaged dependencies to make sure the licensing > is in order. The following is a good resource: > > http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html > > However, scanning the Oozie source, I didn't find any binary artifacts, save: > > ./core/src/test/resources/wordcount-simple_Linux-amd64-64_h20: ELF > 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked > (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.4.0, not stripped > ./core/src/test/resources/wordcount-simple_Linux-i386-32_h20: ELF > 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically > linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, not stripped > ./core/src/test/resources/wordcount-simple_Mac_OS_X-x86_64-64_h20: > Mach-O executable i386 > > Other than these, it looks like the licensing/redistribution will be > dead simple as long as it's a source release. Where do these come > from? > > We'll also want to run RAT over the release tarball: > http://incubator.apache.org/rat > > This should be enough to get started: > > http://apache.org/dev/release.html#what-must-every-release-contain > > -C > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Mohammad Islam <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> I would like to start the process of releasing Oozie 3.1 (QE-certified and >> currently used at Yahoo production). >> >> 3.1 branch is already created. >> >> Please don't commit anything until further email. >> >> I will let know during the first release process. >> >> Since this will be our first release at Apache, we expect to learn a lot of >> new thing. Please bear with us. >> >> Regards, >> Mohammad
