Oh, well that's easy. A note in the LICENSE would probably be
sufficient, then. -C

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <[email protected]> wrote:
> From our old friend Apache Hadoop :) They were just precompiled for
> Oozie dev convenience
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Chris Douglas <[email protected]> wrote:
>> It depends on the license. Where did the code come from? -C
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>>> Chris, thanks for the detailed info,
>>>
>>> Regarding the binaries you found, are for testing MR pipes.
>>>
>>> Should we remove them from the release ?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Alejandro
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Chris Douglas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Great news!
>>>>
>>>> Once the community is satisfied with the state of the artifact, we'll
>>>> need to go over any packaged dependencies to make sure the licensing
>>>> is in order. The following is a good resource:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
>>>>
>>>> However, scanning the Oozie source, I didn't find any binary artifacts, 
>>>> save:
>>>>
>>>> ./core/src/test/resources/wordcount-simple_Linux-amd64-64_h20: ELF
>>>> 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked
>>>> (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.4.0, not stripped
>>>> ./core/src/test/resources/wordcount-simple_Linux-i386-32_h20: ELF
>>>> 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically
>>>> linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, not stripped
>>>> ./core/src/test/resources/wordcount-simple_Mac_OS_X-x86_64-64_h20:
>>>> Mach-O executable i386
>>>>
>>>> Other than these, it looks like the licensing/redistribution will be
>>>> dead simple as long as it's a source release. Where do these come
>>>> from?
>>>>
>>>> We'll also want to run RAT over the release tarball:
>>>> http://incubator.apache.org/rat
>>>>
>>>> This should be enough to get started:
>>>>
>>>> http://apache.org/dev/release.html#what-must-every-release-contain
>>>>
>>>> -C
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Mohammad Islam <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> I would like to start the process of releasing Oozie 3.1 (QE-certified 
>>>>> and currently used at Yahoo production).
>>>>>
>>>>> 3.1 branch is already created.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please don't commit anything until further email.
>>>>>
>>>>> I will let know during the first release process.
>>>>>
>>>>> Since this will be our first release at Apache, we expect to learn a lot 
>>>>> of new thing. Please bear with us.
>>>>>
>>>>>  Regards,
>>>>> Mohammad

Reply via email to