>From our old friend Apache Hadoop :) They were just precompiled for
Oozie dev convenience

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:46 PM, Chris Douglas <[email protected]> wrote:
> It depends on the license. Where did the code come from? -C
>
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Alejandro Abdelnur <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Chris, thanks for the detailed info,
>>
>> Regarding the binaries you found, are for testing MR pipes.
>>
>> Should we remove them from the release ?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Alejandro
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Chris Douglas <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Great news!
>>>
>>> Once the community is satisfied with the state of the artifact, we'll
>>> need to go over any packaged dependencies to make sure the licensing
>>> is in order. The following is a good resource:
>>>
>>> http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html
>>>
>>> However, scanning the Oozie source, I didn't find any binary artifacts, 
>>> save:
>>>
>>> ./core/src/test/resources/wordcount-simple_Linux-amd64-64_h20: ELF
>>> 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked
>>> (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.4.0, not stripped
>>> ./core/src/test/resources/wordcount-simple_Linux-i386-32_h20: ELF
>>> 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically
>>> linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux 2.6.9, not stripped
>>> ./core/src/test/resources/wordcount-simple_Mac_OS_X-x86_64-64_h20:
>>> Mach-O executable i386
>>>
>>> Other than these, it looks like the licensing/redistribution will be
>>> dead simple as long as it's a source release. Where do these come
>>> from?
>>>
>>> We'll also want to run RAT over the release tarball:
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/rat
>>>
>>> This should be enough to get started:
>>>
>>> http://apache.org/dev/release.html#what-must-every-release-contain
>>>
>>> -C
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Mohammad Islam <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I would like to start the process of releasing Oozie 3.1 (QE-certified and 
>>>> currently used at Yahoo production).
>>>>
>>>> 3.1 branch is already created.
>>>>
>>>> Please don't commit anything until further email.
>>>>
>>>> I will let know during the first release process.
>>>>
>>>> Since this will be our first release at Apache, we expect to learn a lot 
>>>> of new thing. Please bear with us.
>>>>
>>>>  Regards,
>>>> Mohammad

Reply via email to