-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3069/#review5971
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


after comment regarding the core POM


/trunk/core/pom.xml
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/3069/#comment12945>

    this exclusion is not needed


- Alejandro


On 2012-03-13 00:36:47, Angelo K. Huang wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/3069/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2012-03-13 00:36:47)
> 
> 
> Review request for oozie.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> This improvement is mainly to add client parameter options to handle user 
> specified authentication option. In Oozie-77, client authentication uses 
> fall-back strategy to handle authentication, such as kerberos -> simple. User 
> should allow to give parameter or property to specify which authentication to 
> use.
> 
> A proposal is :
> 
> -auth simple
> -auth kerberos
> -auth <auth_name> 
> 
> 
> This addresses bug OOZIE-624.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-624
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /trunk/client/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/cli/OozieCLI.java 1298705 
>   /trunk/client/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/client/AuthOozieClient.java 
> 1298705 
>   /trunk/client/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/client/OozieClient.java 
> 1298705 
>   /trunk/client/src/main/java/org/apache/oozie/client/XOozieClient.java 
> 1298705 
>   /trunk/core/pom.xml 1298705 
>   /trunk/core/src/main/conf/oozie-site.xml 1298705 
>   /trunk/core/src/main/resources/oozie-default.xml 1298705 
>   /trunk/docs/src/site/twiki/DG_CommandLineTool.twiki 1298705 
>   /trunk/docs/src/site/twiki/ENG_Custom_Authentication.twiki PRE-CREATION 
>   /trunk/docs/src/site/twiki/index.twiki 1298705 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/3069/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Angelo K.
> 
>

Reply via email to