On 22 Feb 2016, at 16:23, Hannes Mehnert <han...@mehnert.org> wrote: > > When a new release of any dependency is issued, this might be > incompatible with earlier versions (unfortunately we don't enforce > semantic versioning, afaik elm does this and opam should adapt).
Interesting idea -- so this would mean that OPAM has to remap upstream versions into something that is a semantic version. Does Elm eliminate this by mandating that libraries should "natively" all be semantically versioned? We can't do this in OCaml today since there are too many upstream packages with their own versioning notions. Anil _______________________________________________ opam-devel mailing list opam-devel@lists.ocaml.org http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel