On 02/22/16 05:31 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > Interesting idea -- so this would mean that OPAM has to remap > upstream versions into something that is a semantic version. > > Does Elm eliminate this by mandating that libraries should > "natively" all be semantically versioned? We can't do this in > OCaml today since there are too many upstream packages with > their own versioning notions.
Elm seems to check whether the API is compatible, and if not, only accepts a release if major is bumped: https://github.com/elm-lang/elm-package#version-rules What does "own versioning notions" mean? I'd appreciate if the community would enforce (by peer pressure and adequate tooling) semantic versioning for the main opam-repository. hannes
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ opam-devel mailing list opam-devel@lists.ocaml.org http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel
