> On 22 Feb 2016, at 16:39, Hannes Mehnert <han...@mehnert.org> wrote: > > On 02/22/16 05:31 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: >> Interesting idea -- so this would mean that OPAM has to remap >> upstream versions into something that is a semantic version. >> >> Does Elm eliminate this by mandating that libraries should >> "natively" all be semantically versioned? We can't do this in >> OCaml today since there are too many upstream packages with >> their own versioning notions. > > Elm seems to check whether the API is compatible, and if not, only > accepts a release if major is bumped: > https://github.com/elm-lang/elm-package#version-rules > > What does "own versioning notions" mean? I'd appreciate if the > community would enforce (by peer pressure and adequate tooling) semantic > versioning for the main opam-repository.
Thanks, this mostly answers my question. :) Amir _______________________________________________ opam-devel mailing list opam-devel@lists.ocaml.org http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel
