On 01/08/2008 02:50 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Ralf Hemmecke wrote: > > | Looks like that should be something like > | > | for i in 1..#vl1 repeat > | t.k.i = 0 => iterate; > | > | (At least that is what I would write in Aldor instead of putting a dummy > | value.) > > Indeed. And that is what the AXIOM book by Jenks&Sutor documents. > Apologies for asking, but why would we want to change that?
Did I say something must be changed? I just said that I find the "=>iterate" contruction less confusing than the "=>l" construction. Both should work. Ralf ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ open-axiom-devel mailing list open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel
