On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Martin Rubey wrote: | Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | > On Tue, 8 Jan 2008, Martin Rubey wrote: | > | > | | > | Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | | > | > | > Indeed. And that is what the AXIOM book by Jenks&Sutor documents. | > | > | > Apologies for asking, but why would we want to change that? | > | > | | > | > | Did I say something must be changed? | > | > | > | > I don't think I said you, Ralf, suggested that. | > | > | > | > My understanding of the discussion was that someone was proposing something | > | > different from the documented => iterate. | > | | > | No, sorry. As far as I know, in SPAD, | > | | > | => iterate (in fact, not sure about that one) | > | | > | => "next" | > | | > | => "iterate" | > | | > | => nil | > | | > | => "leave" | > | | > | are all equivalent. And I proposed to make them all the same. The semantics | > | of => should *not* be changed. | > | > My suggestion is that all, except the `=> iterate', are not documented. | | What's the documentation of => iterate?
I'm travelling without my Axiom book (Jens&Sutor) with me, but I'm sure anyone who has the book handy can quote the documentation. -- Gaby ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ open-axiom-devel mailing list open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel
