Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > Indeed. And that is what the AXIOM book by Jenks&Sutor documents. > | > Apologies for asking, but why would we want to change that? > | > | Did I say something must be changed? > > I don't think I said you, Ralf, suggested that. > > My understanding of the discussion was that someone was proposing something > different from the documented => iterate.
No, sorry. As far as I know, in SPAD, => iterate (in fact, not sure about that one) => "next" => "iterate" => nil => "leave" are all equivalent. And I proposed to make them all the same. The semantics of => should *not* be changed. Martin > > -- Gaby > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "FriCAS - computer algebra system" group. > To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/fricas-devel?hl=en > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace _______________________________________________ open-axiom-devel mailing list open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel
