On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > > Well, the change was incomplete. Now mainline adequately reflects > the above restriction. The number of functions affected grew, but not > significantly. Overall, each time I looked at the affected functions, I > had a distinct feeling of reading an OCCC code; so, I think the change > is for the better. >
I think the change is for the better also. But what is OCCC code? > There may be fallout -- I hope not too much. If so, please file > a bug report. Because of this substantial change to the language, I will update the version of OpenAxiom on axiom-wiki again in the next day or so and check for damages. Thanks again for your continuing development of SPAD... I wonder actually whether it might be soon appropriate to look for a new name? :-) Regards, Bill Page. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ open-axiom-devel mailing list open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel
