"Bill Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
| >
| > Well, the change was incomplete. Now mainline adequately reflects
| > the above restriction. The number of functions affected grew, but not
| > significantly. Overall, each time I looked at the affected functions, I
| > had a distinct feeling of reading an OCCC code; so, I think the change
| > is for the better.
| >
|
| I think the change is for the better also. But what is OCCC code?
Obfuscated C Code Contest
http://www.ioccc.org/main.html
| > There may be fallout -- I hope not too much. If so, please file
| > a bug report.
|
| Because of this substantial change to the language, I will update the
| version of OpenAxiom on axiom-wiki again in the next day or so and
| check for damages.
OK, thanks.
Note however that because the code generator is not updated to reflect
this change, there are new valid semantics possibilities not
implemented. However, old valid codes that respect this new rule
should not be affected (otherwise we have a bug).
| Thanks again for your continuing development of SPAD... I wonder
| actually whether it might be soon appropriate to look for a new name?
| :-)
I have not gotten my favoured features in yet :-)
-- Gaby
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100.
Use priority code J8TL2D2.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone
_______________________________________________
open-axiom-devel mailing list
open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel
