Ralf Hemmecke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| > Is Mapping different from Mapping because I can write
| >    Mapping(Integer,Integer)
| > and
| >    Mapping(Integer,Integer,Integer)
| > ?
| 
| That depends on the definition of Mapping. 

Good.  Where is the definition of SubDomain then?

| Unfortunately, I am not so
| good in SPAD and Mapping seems to be rather tightly connected to the
| internals. So let me try to explain in Aldor. I hope, you don't mind.
| 
| A(X: with): with == add;
| A(X: with, Y: with): with == add;
| B(T: Tuple Type): with == add;
| 
| There are two A's and one B although you can call for both

There is no way to define overloaded constructors in all AXIOM systems.

-- Gaby

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
open-axiom-devel mailing list
open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel

Reply via email to