On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> ...
> In the field of fraction of polynomial, the fact that 1/(2d) is well
> defined seals no doubt.  It does not matter whether d can take
> on the value zero.  That is just a simple fact.  That is one of
> reasons why simplification of expressions that assume
> fraction of polynomials prove inadequate some times.
>

If "d can take on the value zero" doesn't that imply we are thinking
of '1/(2d)' as a function?

Isn't the following result another example such an error?

(1) -> q:=((x^2-1)/(x-1))

   (1)  x + 1
                                            Type: Fraction Polynomial Integer
(2) -> q(1)

   (2)  2
                                            Type: PositiveInteger

Surely the fact that we can write (2) means this simplification is unjustified.

> Have a look at this wonderful paper by James Davenport.
>
>   "Equality in Computer Algebra and Beyond"
>

Thanks, I will review it again. You have referred to this paper before:

http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=87od8i6aej.fsf_-_%40gauss.cs.tamu.edu

In the abstract from which you quote Davenport writes:

"For example, we refer to Q(x) as "rational functions", even though
(x^2-1)/(x-1) and x+1 are not equal as functions from R to R, since
the former is not defined at x=1, even though they are equal as
elements of Q(x)."

But as I recall he does not deal with this issue in greater
specificity in the rest of the paper.

For the accessibility challenged here is an alternate (free) link:

http://www.calculemus.net/meetings/siena01/Papers/Davenport.ps

to this paper.

Regards,
Bill Page.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW!
Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project,
along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness
and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________
open-axiom-devel mailing list
open-axiom-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel

Reply via email to