On Tuesday 01 February 2005 22:37, Timothy Miller wrote: > Rodolphe Ortalo wrote: [...] > > Just keep in mind that we're on a tight transistor budget. Some things > will have to be sacrificed for the sake of being able to have a product. > It would be nice to have lots of security features that not everyone > else has, but we're going to have enough of a challenge just trying to > be "as good". > > Security is an issue on my mind, as evidenced by some of my recent > posts, but just don't expect from us what you usually get from the > high-end CAD vendors.
Of course. But you know, sometimes security guys are just so easy guys: they want only one way to do only one thing at only one time... And they only care about the "only"... ;-) I'm just trying to reformulate security constraints so that you can propose some feasible hw mechanims (feasible considering your transistor budget and your other primary design objectives). And, anyway... take care not to solder any motherboard. That's desastrous for the image... ;-) That's a pun; but S3 boards were such a pain to program with all these hw bugs or semi-bugs that many simply dropped the job... (including me). Rodolphe _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
