Certainly, I think we should implement 1.x first, but we should examine 2.x to make sure we don't leave out any important hardware features.
On 4/26/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > VESA BIOS Extensions (VBE) are feasible for fairly quick turnaround for > 1.x support, but 2.x gets somewhat complicated with protected mode memory > mapping, frame buffers and such. Since 2.x includes all of 1.x features, > it would be most realistic to implement 1.x completely and then add 2.x > support as time and resources permit. > > My return question however is: is anyone even using VBE anymore? > > - Sean Kelly ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
