On 8/22/05, Lourens Veen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Monday 22 August 2005 18:56, Jack Carroll wrote: > > Possibly community contributions may need to be dual-licensed from > > the beginning, so that they're under LGPL, but Traversal is also allowed to > > merge them with proprietary Verilog files that go into the ASIC build. Or > > maybe LGPL allows both uses of outside contributions as long as the source > > files are statically linked but not actually merged; I haven't really > > studied LGPL the way I have GPL. > > Is there any reason why we would want to permit linking the software model > with proprietary software? I don't see why it shouldn't just be the GPL > rather than the LGPL...
As a member of the Free Software community, I want the linking clause in there. The LGPL has its place, but the GPL is powerful in its ability to keep us from getting ripped off. _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
