On Wed, Sep 07, 2005 at 04:18:42PM -0400, Timothy Miller wrote:
> On 9/7/05, Jack Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Would you like me to continue developing the number system?
>
> Please do, but I apologize in advance that I may have to have you
> repeat yourself when it comes time for me to have a more urgent need
> for this.
>
> One good place for you to put this is the wiki on duskglow
> (opengraphics.org). Start a section on part numbering and all that,
> list Traversal part numbers, etc. But published there, it would be a
> great resource for other organizations to model themselves after also.
>
> What do you think?
I've just made my first attempt at contributing to the wiki. I went
to the end of the existing page on OG videocard naming, and did a brain dump
of the naming and numbering decisions we've been discussing. Before I go
back through the e-mail threads and clean things up, how about taking a
look, and tell me what you think?
One thing I saw pretty quick is that the Duskglow wiki's formatting
doesn't follow Wikipedia's formatting manual. The list formatting didn't
come out the way I expected; looks like learning curve stuff.
Wiki wouldn't work for the A-100A standards; they need to go under
ECO control eventually, so they need to have identifiable original files
stored off line. Besides, engineering documents need a lot of formatting,
so OpenOffice.org or maybe Kword is a better choice. I hope to get into
that pretty soon.
Any comments on the format rules I proposed to distinguish between
product part numbers and internal stock numbers, before I go back to the
numbering system standard?
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
