OK, then, I'll read back through the e-mail threads on naming and
numbering, and check the wiki page against them. When that looks OK to me,
I'll report task done.
Yes, that is one nice job, you did there!
>From the wiki:
"OGP-1-A or OGP-1-1-A: Open Graphics Project standard 1 or 1-1, Revision A"
Would it be a good idea write version numbers as 1.1.a, so OGP-1-1-A would become OGP-1.1.a
The format would then be (spaces inserted for make it more readable)
OG <A|C|D|P> - <[1-9] A|E|P> - <[1-9].[1.9].[a-z]>
Using dots for version number would make it more clear, that it is a version number you are dealing with.
>From the wiki:
"An upgrade or redesign without significant architecture change could be
called TRV10A??, again in line with part number practice typical in the
industry."
'A' is used for a awful for ASCI and Architecture. What about using R1 for Reversion 1? R haven't been used yet.
Got the idea from from Unicode Standard
http://www.unicode.org/unicode/standard/versions/
And finally. The wiki doesn't have a link for the schedule
http://opengraphics.gitk.com/ogplan.jpg
Could that be added? =)
Martin
_______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
