On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 03:27:56AM +0200, Martin Jeppesen wrote:
> > 
> > OK, then, I'll read back through the e-mail threads on naming and
> > numbering, and check the wiki page against them. When that looks OK to me,
> > I'll report task done.
> 
> 
> Yes, that is one nice job, you did there!
> 
> >From the wiki:
> "OGP-1-A or OGP-1-1-A: Open Graphics Project standard 1 or 1-1, Revision A" 
> 
> Would it be a good idea write version numbers as 1.1.a, so OGP-1-1-A would 
> become OGP-1.1.a
>  
> The format would then be (spaces inserted for make it more readable)
>  
> OG <A|C|D|P> - <[1-9] A|E|P> - <[1-9].[1.9].[a-z]>
>  
> Using dots for version number would make it more clear, that it is a version 
> number you are dealing with.


        I believe that we would be better off numbering our standards and
their versions the same way other standards organizations do.  Our readers
are likely to be familiar with existing practices.


> >From the wiki:
> "An upgrade or redesign without significant architecture change could be 
> called TRV10A??, again in line with part number practice typical in the 
> industry."
>  
> 'A' is used for a awful for ASCI and Architecture. What about using R1 for 
> Reversion 1? R haven't been used yet.


        Remember the context.  This is a part number for an IC.  Hardware
engineers are used to the idea that a 74HC161A is an upgraded 74HC161. 
Also, variable parameters such as temperature range are traditionally coded
at a particular character position in a fixed-length string.  To avoid
causing confusion and having to constantly explain ourselves, we should
follow practices traditional in the field wherever there is no compelling
reason to do otherwise.

>  
> Got the idea from from Unicode Standard
> http://www.unicode.org/unicode/standard/versions/
>  
> And finally. The wiki doesn't have a link for the schedule
> http://opengraphics.gitk.com/ogplan.jpg
> 
> Could that be added? =)


        Please do.  I'm not familiar with this item, but you know what it
is.
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to