On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 17:44:43 -0500
"Timothy Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes. Howard has that on his to-do list. He didn't expect it would be
> needed, since the BOM isn't really critical to check the correctness
> of the diagram. But he's working on it.
While he is at it, a description of the various nets wouldn't
be bad either, though it would be quite a lot of work.
It does not need to describe all wires, but at least
what the various groups are.
My prob is, although i know what the chips should do, i do
not know their exact specs, thus i would have to read all
specs before to tell whether there is a bug/mistake/....
Someone here said, he's going to make a geda version of the
schematics. I think we could spread this work over a few
people and make a schematic that is highly annotated
including most (if not all) design decissions.
Attila Kinali
--
wer soviel schoggi isst, kann sowieso nicht dumm sein ;-)
-- Sandra
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
