On 4/6/06, André Pouliot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> It's all depend of your target for a sound card. As most other post in
> the mailing list seem to point it's more a card for professional so the
> higher the better but going more than 24bit 192Khz is not useful. If you
> want to make a card for the linux market most people don't need more
> than the classic 44,1Khz 16 bit(with a good protection from noise) so
> most old card do the job. But it's sure would be nice to use a card who
> have realtime dolby digital encoding, an optical connector output and
> work on any platform.

It's good that you're thinking about economy here, but we're going for
very high-end here because it helps us to absorb some of the high
parts costs I'm proposing.  Plus, a lot of this stuff is just
marketing.  If you can do 192KHz, do it, because it looks more
impressive on paper than 92.
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to