> Sorry, I committed before reading your mail. We should maybe have a > policy for how to arrange the source tree. Maybe even some common > makefile rules. If I may extrapolate what you said, I'd suggest then > that we keep each core in a subdirectory directly under rtl, and if > there are two implementations of, say, a memory controllers, they just > have to be named differently (mem_ctl, ddrsdram_ctl, mem_ctrl_johndoe, > ...). Does that sound right? > > In any case, we can rename my implementation to mem_ctl or mem_ctl_npi. Let me look at how SVN represents branches of a code base, as well as get to a mail client that will properly top quote emails. For the time being, don't worry about it. You're correct though, we do need to give some up front through about how to layout the system. Patrick M
_______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
