My own opinion is that we should do the latter, that is establish ourselves around a single focused application of open hardware, much like FOSS did around the OS.
But keep our views completely disjoint from our engineering, that is the actual technology we will finally produce. That will require a marketing campaign, and is a totally seperate issue from our public face and organizational culture. That's just my opinion, it's not very well thought out yet. On 10/13/06, luc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le vendredi 13 octobre 2006 à 09:09 -0600, Lance Hanlen a écrit : After reading all the thread, I wonder if there's not a confusion between getting more exposure for open hardware and more exposure for OGP? Should we make noise for open hardware and presenting OGP as an example among some other? Or should we make noise for OGP because it's about open hardware?
-- _Lance _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
