> > By video, do you mean motion, like watching TV/movie? Even more > > silicon required. Awhile back I proposed building a Ethernet > > X/video/audio server using the OGP ASIC chip. Less expensive > > than the OGD1. > > > > I mean video -- i.e., a 'CPU server' creates a stream of images sent > over ethernet to a 'dumb terminal' which spits it out on a screen.
Different people mean different things by "video". Video can mean the display, even if it is static. Or video can mean 24-60 frames/second. The 24-60 frames/second variety needs more bandwidth and more silicon. > I > guessed OGD1 could create this stream, but due to Fisher ? > Only I can't seem to justify the money for > OGD1 in every 'dumb terminal' with Matrox G450s so cheap... Sounds like you want the OGC (ASIC) version, rather than the OGD. _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
