Le mercredi 15 novembre 2006 à 17:42 -0800, Nick LaForge a écrit : > it seems it would be better to simply have the CPU of the 'CPU server' > do this. That leaves us with what we have, awaiting multi-core CPUs > for real time ray-tracing. Only I can't seem to justify the money for > OGD1 in every 'dumb terminal' with Matrox G450s so cheap... but my > 'distributed' style of computing, I guess, is rare with 'consumers'. > > (Interestingly, companies are realizing, despite the surplus of PC > hardware, a large distributed system of cheap parts costs tons in > power consumption. Hence the new wave of low-power multi-core CPUs. > (I wonder how much Google wastes on electricity.)) I've read somwhere (in The Register, I think) that the Google's energy bill was something like 100M$. That sounds a little bit too much, there's maybe an error in the typos. > _______________________________________________ > Open-graphics mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics > List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com) >
_______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
