Le mercredi 16 mai 2007 à 20:48 +0200, Daniel Rozsnyó a écrit : > luc marschall wrote: > > hello everybody, I come back on the list (*) > > > > Currently, the ogd has two dvi and one s-video output: > > everything goes > > out since it's a graphics-card. > > However I suggest something more closed to the electronic > > consumers > > which have certainly a camera (digital or still analog). Hence, > > would it > > be a good idea if a variant of ogc had: > > - one dvi output > > - one s-video output > > - and one s-video input (or something else more suitable) ? > > I think that this feature is not the way to go.. new cameras have USB > or FireWire - all mainboards have USB, some of them also FireWire, but a > FW add-on PCI card is cheap.. as well as an analog-to-firewire > conversion box. > > If anybody wanted to capture SVIDEO signal, he/she has a (prop.) graphic > card with VIVO, or a (prop.) tv card with aux inputs. > > Analog video is past. Certainly it's past, however, I've make a tour on the major manufacturers' website (Sony, Jvc, Canon..) and they all provide an analog video output. I think that none of them do the assumption that the consumer has a PC or the latest TV. But all provide an utility software for Windows and maybe for Apple, still Linux could access the SD card or the hard-disk of these camcorders simply through USB or FW ? So far, having a graphic-card with analog video input won't help to dump the camcorder's memory on the PC. For the less it's good enough with DV tape camcorder, and if one doesn't need to make video editing. > > Daniel >
_______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list [email protected] http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)
