Blake, I didn't see if this was already asked and answered elsewhere and I don't know if it will help in the ACQ interfaces, but, did you give the user in question multiple working locations via the user permission editor?
HTH, -- Mike Rylander | President | Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts | phone: 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) | email: [email protected] | web: http://www.esilibrary.com On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Blake Henderson < [email protected]> wrote: > Hello all, > > I apologize for the duplicate email, I sent this to the dev list and it > was suggested that I send it to the general list: > > I couldn't find a bug on this. We are using acq for the first time and I > don't want to jump to any conclusions. When creating a PO and assigning > the copies to their branches and copy locations, we noticed that the UI > only shows the copy locations for the branch that you happen to be > registered to. We have a scenario where a single branch is doing all of > the PO's for all of the sibling branches. Are we doing something wrong? > During some experimenting, I found that if you register the user to the > system level instead of the branch level, it will show all of the copy > locations for each branch. That, of course, is not a good idea for other > reasons. We ruled permissions out by assigning the EVERYTHING^consortium > to the user. > > It seems like if the software allows the copies to be assigned to > different branches, it should also allow copies to get assigned to the > respective shelving location in that branch. > > -- > -Blake- > Conducting Magic > MOBIUS > > >
