Mike,
We do have the working locations setup (checked) on each of the branches
in the system for the user in question. We only see the copy locations
populated for the branch that the workstation is registered.
-Blake-
Conducting Magic
MOBIUS
573-234-4513
877-312-3517
On 12/12/2014 9:23 AM, Mike Rylander wrote:
Blake,
I didn't see if this was already asked and answered elsewhere and I
don't know if it will help in the ACQ interfaces, but, did you give
the user in question multiple working locations via the user
permission editor?
HTH,
--
Mike Rylander
| President
| Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts
| phone: 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457)
| email: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
| web: http://www.esilibrary.com
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Blake Henderson
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hello all,
I apologize for the duplicate email, I sent this to the dev list
and it was suggested that I send it to the general list:
I couldn't find a bug on this. We are using acq for the first
time and I
don't want to jump to any conclusions. When creating a PO and
assigning
the copies to their branches and copy locations, we noticed that
the UI
only shows the copy locations for the branch that you happen to be
registered to. We have a scenario where a single branch is doing
all of
the PO's for all of the sibling branches. Are we doing something
wrong?
During some experimenting, I found that if you register the user
to the
system level instead of the branch level, it will show all of the copy
locations for each branch. That, of course, is not a good idea for
other
reasons. We ruled permissions out by assigning the
EVERYTHING^consortium to the user.
It seems like if the software allows the copies to be assigned to
different branches, it should also allow copies to get assigned to the
respective shelving location in that branch.
--
-Blake-
Conducting Magic
MOBIUS
