This is probably a limitation within AutoFieldWidget. It has a special handler for copy locations to avoid loading all perm-visible locations, which can be many thousands in some consortia. This seems like a good candidate for a typeahead box -- openils.widget.PCrudAutocompleteBox in this context.
-b On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Blake Henderson < [email protected]> wrote: > > Mike, > > We do have the working locations setup (checked) on each of the branches > in the system for the user in question. We only see the copy locations > populated for the branch that the workstation is registered. > > -Blake- > Conducting Magic > MOBIUS573-234-4513877-312-3517 > > On 12/12/2014 9:23 AM, Mike Rylander wrote: > > Blake, > > I didn't see if this was already asked and answered elsewhere and I > don't know if it will help in the ACQ interfaces, but, did you give the > user in question multiple working locations via the user permission editor? > > HTH, > > > -- > Mike Rylander > | President > | Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts > | phone: 1-877-OPEN-ILS (673-6457) > | email: [email protected] > | web: http://www.esilibrary.com > > > On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Blake Henderson < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> I apologize for the duplicate email, I sent this to the dev list and it >> was suggested that I send it to the general list: >> >> I couldn't find a bug on this. We are using acq for the first time and I >> don't want to jump to any conclusions. When creating a PO and assigning >> the copies to their branches and copy locations, we noticed that the UI >> only shows the copy locations for the branch that you happen to be >> registered to. We have a scenario where a single branch is doing all of >> the PO's for all of the sibling branches. Are we doing something wrong? >> During some experimenting, I found that if you register the user to the >> system level instead of the branch level, it will show all of the copy >> locations for each branch. That, of course, is not a good idea for other >> reasons. We ruled permissions out by assigning the EVERYTHING^consortium >> to the user. >> >> It seems like if the software allows the copies to be assigned to >> different branches, it should also allow copies to get assigned to the >> respective shelving location in that branch. >> >> -- >> -Blake- >> Conducting Magic >> MOBIUS >> >> >> > >
